Supreme Court Justice Scalia says we’ll have to decide on “handheld rocket launchers”

This is where “original intent” proponents are not only scary, they are dangerous, and their rigid beliefs on how the constitution should be interpreted is a danger to us all.

On Sunday, Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia said, “handheld rocket launchers” will need to be decided. Hence, he has left open the possibility that they could be considered constitutional.

The constitution says nothing about handheld rocket launchers, therefore it is up to us as a society to decide if we think citizens should be able to lawfully own them. But in Scalia’s strict and narrow “original intent” interpretation of the constitution he would try to get into the minds of the founding fathers and determine what they would do (at that time). Well, they didn’t have handheld rocket launchers at that time and they didn’t have assault weapons (card-carrying NRA members, I don’t care what you want to call them, that’s what they are) at that time. Since the Second Amendment is so vague (and I don’t even think Scalia would argue with that) that means it is up to us to put pressure on the executive and legislative branches of government to enact sensible gun restrictions in the present. And these restrictions are subject to change as society changes. We don’t need to be stuck in the past on this issue, regardless of the “opinion” of one Supreme Court justice.


Get The Left Call Delivered To Your Inbox:

Government

#Antonin Scalia#assault weapon#bear arms#Founding Fathers#gun control#guns#handheld rocket launcher#justice#original intent#second amendment#Supreme Court